Represented the largest direct broadcast satellite service provider in a constitutional case at trial and on appeal before Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, where both courts ruled that a higher tax rate on satellite services than on cable services discriminates against interstate commerce, a violation of the United States Constitution's Commerce Clause. 

Represent one of the world's largest auto manufacturers and its vehicle and equipment leasing arm in state and local tax controversy, compliance, planning, and litigation. Also counsel on compliance matters involving emerging technologies, such as GPS and autonomous vehicle software, which are transforming and challenging the traditional application of tax regimes.

Represent one of the world's largest auto manufacturers and its vehicle and equipment leasing arm in state and local tax controversy, compliance, planning, and litigation. Also counsel on compliance matters involving emerging technologies, such as GPS and autonomous vehicle software, which are transforming and challenging the traditional application of tax regimes.

Represented one of the largest telecommunications providers in the United States before the First District Court of Appeal challenging the validity of an assessment of more than $3.1 million of allegedly unpaid Florida sales and use tax. After oral arguments, the First District sided with Verizon, resulting in a significant tax savings for our client. This case set a precedent for cases in Florida (and other states) regarding whether a Notice of Proposed Assessment (NOPA) is really an assessment under Florida statute of limitations.